| "Debunking 
                the Myths of MLM, Part I:The Myth of the Heavy-Hitter"
 Weve heard the myth a thousand times and in as many different 
                ways.
 The company places all the heavy-hitters under themselves.
 They 
                keep the cream and leave us with the crumbs. If 
                youre not the heavy-hitter then youre the heavy- hitters 
                grunt. The 
                only way spillover works is if youre under a heavy- hitter. Heavy-hitters 
                have all kinds of money to put into it. If 
                you dont have tons of money youll never be a heavy- 
                hitter. If 
                youre not a heavy-hitter youre not going to make it 
                in MLM. Youve 
                got your own to add to the list. The 
                point here is that these statements imply that there is a state 
                of being in this business, a position one reaches when one becomes 
                a heavy-hitter, and that being a heavy- hitter or having a heavy-hitter 
                in our organization is necessary to succeed. Poppycock! Im 
                a business person and as such I have genuine business goals with 
                real financial milestones attached to them. But nowhere in my 
                business plan is there the milestone become a heavy-hitter. I 
                want to make a certain amount of money (a lot). I 
                want to cultivate a certain number of contacts and marketing partners 
                (enough to do some of the work for me). I want to be sufficiently 
                knowledgeable about my craft (so that I can be a good sponsor 
                and trainer). These are all my legitimate business goals. Being 
                a heavy-hitter just isnt on the list. And Im willing 
                to bet its not on yours either. Its 
                a myth; an allusion to a state of being or a state of accomplishment 
                to which one can ascribe a label - heavy- hitter. I intend to 
                debunk the myth with fact. Ill 
                start by saying that Ive been called a heavy-hitter; sometimes 
                as a compliment, sometimes with a hint of resentment, sometimes 
                in condescension. At no time has it ever been true. Im not 
                a heavy-hitter. Im a hard worker, yes. Im 
                focused and determined, Ive had some successes and Ive 
                had some failures, and some months I work harder than others. 
                I havent met all my financial objectives but Ive made 
                good progress. When all is said and done all I am is a hard worker 
                with a plan and a determination to see that plan through. Im 
                not a heavy-hitter. In 
                the four years that I've been in network marketing I've tried 
                to mirror, right down to the dime, everything my sponsor does. 
                I buy as many leads at exactly the same time, promote the same 
                programs, provide the same quantity and quality of support and 
                communication to my downline as provided me, and every other manner 
                of duplication that I can. And I keep feeling like I just never 
                get the same results. But 
                the fact is I cant mirror exactly what my sponsor has done 
                because I havent been at it long enough to do everything 
                my sponsor has done. I cant get the results of fifteen years 
                of experience because I dont have fifteen years of experience. This 
                business is about the cumulative effect of work. Organizations 
                grow over time, loyalty grows over time, commissions grow over 
                time, and the experienced marketer evolves over time. We are all, 
                over time, becoming experienced network marketers. The 
                fact is that those we label heavy-hitters are just the ones who 
                have been at it the longest. They have spent years building contacts 
                and earning the trust of their people by being helpful sponsors. 
                They can go into a new program and get a lot of people right away 
                because they already have many people who already trust them and 
                who will join with them. Online, 
                some of the people who are thought of as heavy hitters have opt-in 
                lists that are very large. So when they join a new program they 
                immediately e-mail that opt-in list and build a downline very 
                quickly. But 
                those same experienced marketers can have success in one program 
                and completely bomb out in another program and the factors contributing 
                to their success or failure are exactly the same as the factors 
                contributing to everyone elses (like product and economy). 
                They dont succeed because they are heavy-hitters. What 
                about sponsoring the so called heavy-hitter? What about the idea 
                that having a heavy-hitter in your downline is the only way to 
                succeed? In Lindas course she talks a lot about why it's 
                better to work at sponsoring a lot of serious people, whether 
                they are experienced or not. She explains very well how people 
                who will work and sponsor a few people apiece are worth any number 
                of so called heavy-hitters because its more than enough 
                over time to build a good income. And besides, sponsoring the 
                so called heavy-hitter is no guarantee that theyll seriously 
                work your program. But 
                if youre not yet convinced that the heavy-hitter is just 
                a myth, if you still believe that you need to be a heavy-hitter 
                to sponsor a heavy-hitter consider this: no matter how heavy you 
                hit you don't sponsor a lot of people until you have something 
                to offer that makes people want to join under you. No 
                experienced and successful marketer is going to join a program 
                under someone who has never sponsored another person and has absolutely 
                nothing to offer them. Why would they? They're experienced enough 
                to know that it is always better to join an MLM program under 
                a group of people that can add to what they have to offer. For 
                us, it's our support sites and our lead generating programs. What 
                is it for you? In 
                a future article, The Role of the Media in Perpetuating the Myths 
                of MLM Ill talk about how the media perpetuates this myth 
                about the heavy-hitter and what some of the reasons might be that 
                we buy into their spin on it. For 
                now Ill just leave you with this undisputable fact: the 
                heavy-hitter with a large enough budget and opt-in list to throw 
                at a new program and then do nothing more than walk away and rake 
                in the dough, isnt reality. You 
                can spend your very last advertising dollar trying to find yourself 
                a heavy-hitter and you will have thrown it all away. Its 
                a myth. We would do well to eradicate the term from our collective 
                vocabulary. It is not a legitimate business goal. It is not a 
                measurable state of being or achievement. It is not a realizable 
                recruit. Its a myth of the business. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Darlene Loebel has been a full-time network marketer for the past 
                4 years. Along with Linda Bruton, she co-manages the MLM 
                Millionaire Training Systems website.
      |